
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 220W, a 195W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+496% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 198.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌780% higher power demand at 220W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 220W, a 195W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+496% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 198.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌780% higher power demand at 220W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce MX450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce MX450 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 496%. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 22,172+496% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 5888+557% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+530% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1725 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 184+188% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX450 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 460% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 448 GB/s+460% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 159.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+48% | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce MX450 costs 49.9% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 198% better value.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-50% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 44.4+198% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GA104 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #523 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












