G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce MX450

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+446% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 242.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.

GeForce MX450

2020

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+446% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 242.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce MX450?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 3,720 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GeForce MX450 is a 2020 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 446.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about 59.6% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and you are getting 446.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 242.1%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce MX450 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce MX450 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $250 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX450 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce MX450	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	90 FPS	152 FPS
medium	80 FPS	137 FPS
high	63 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	80 FPS	131 FPS
medium	68 FPS	107 FPS
high	52 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	39 FPS	77 FPS
medium	37 FPS	65 FPS
high	25 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce MX450 Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce MX450	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	125 FPS	425 FPS
medium	92 FPS	366 FPS
high	65 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	248 FPS
1440p
low	82 FPS	272 FPS
medium	56 FPS	229 FPS
high	41 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	133 FPS
medium	27 FPS	114 FPS
high	21 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	73 FPS

Open GeForce MX450 Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce MX450	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	167 FPS	859 FPS
medium	134 FPS	693 FPS
high	112 FPS	602 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	457 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	658 FPS
medium	100 FPS	529 FPS
high	84 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	434 FPS
medium	67 FPS	346 FPS
high	56 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	221 FPS

Open GeForce MX450 Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce MX450	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	167 FPS	580 FPS
medium	134 FPS	514 FPS
high	112 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	478 FPS
medium	100 FPS	427 FPS
high	84 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	290 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	285 FPS
medium	67 FPS	266 FPS
high	56 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	195 FPS

Open GeForce MX450 Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce MX450

The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 446%. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX450	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	3,720	20,312+446%
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	4864+443%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	16.2 TFLOPS+402%
Boost Clock	1575 MHz	1665 MHz+6%
ROPs	32	80+150%
TMUs	64	152+138%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX450 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce MX450	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 460% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce MX450	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	8 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	80 GB/s	448 GB/s+460%
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 155.6% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.

Feature	GeForce MX450	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP	25W-88%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-42%	600W
Power Connector	Mobile	8-pin
Length	—	242mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	148.8+46%	101.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce MX450 costs 37.3% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 241.6% better value.