
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 70W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌47.9% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+189% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 327.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌180% higher power demand at 70W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 70W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+189% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 327.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌47.9% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌180% higher power demand at 70W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than GeForce MX450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce MX450 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 121 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 189%. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1470 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 10,749+189% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2304+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+110% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz+7% | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 72+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX450 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 110% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Bus width: 64-bit vs 96-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 168 GB/s+110% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 94.7% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-64% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 160mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8 | 153.6+3% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 32.4% less ($81 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 326.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $169-32% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 63.6+327% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GA107 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #523 | #252 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












