
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,353 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+165.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+165.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,353 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 220 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 165.9%. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353 | 19,548+166% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3072+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+811% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 2460 MHz+118% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 3 MB+436% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 980M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980M is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 70% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 272 GB/s+70% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 14% difference. The GeForce GTX 980M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-13% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5 | 170.0+131% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Codename | GM204 | AD107 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #344 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












