
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

Quadro M5000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro M5000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅23.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Quadro M5000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅23.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro M5000M better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 980M make more sense than Quadro M5000M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 43 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and Quadro M5000M

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M
The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 and the Quadro M5000M reaches 7,056 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro M5000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 1 (Quadro M5000M). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1051 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353+4% | 7,056 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1,536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 2.995 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz+7% | 1051 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M5000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5000M has 8 GB. The Quadro M5000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the Quadro M5000M's 100W — a 0% difference. The Quadro M5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 350W (Quadro M5000M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5+4% | 70.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












