
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅66.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅66.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 980M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 36.9%. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353 | 10,064+37% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2560+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+435% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 1733 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 960 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 20% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 192 GB/s+20% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 57.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 980M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-44% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 173mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5+31% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Codename | GM204 | GP104 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #344 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












