
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌44.2% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅5.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅5.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌44.2% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A2000 better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and RTX A2000

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

RTX A2000
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711+2% | 13,464 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 3328+18% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS+32% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1200 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 176+69% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 3.3 MB+230% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 has 8 GB. The RTX A2000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 192.3+251% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. The RTX A2000 costs 30.7% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 offers 41.7% better value. The RTX A2000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $450-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 29.9+42% |
| Codename | GM200 | GA106 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #179 | #186 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













