
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌30.1% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅75.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅75.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌30.1% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 61.7%. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711 | 22,172+62% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 5888+109% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+235% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1725 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 176 | 184+5% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 5.8 MB+480% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 448 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 220W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 100.8+84% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 23.1% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 110.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $499-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 44.4+110% |
| Codename | GM200 | GA104 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #179 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













