
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅+15.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌160.6% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅5.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 13,711).
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+15.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Why buy it
- ✅5.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌160.6% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 13,711).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti leads by 15.3%. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711+15% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+10% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1755 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 176+120% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2.5 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 91.5+67% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 61.6% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 126.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $249-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 47.8+127% |
| Codename | GM200 | GA106 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #179 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













