
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌8.3% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅92.0% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 112.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅92.0% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 112.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌8.3% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 96.3%. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711 | 26,919+96% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 5888+109% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+381% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 2475 MHz+130% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 176 | 184+5% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 5.8 MB+480% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 36 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 504 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 36 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 134.6+146% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 7.7% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 112.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $599-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 44.9+113% |
| Codename | GM200 | AD104 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #179 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













