
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅+36.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌160.6% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 13,711).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+36.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Why buy it
- ✅4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌160.6% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 13,711).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 980 Ti make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti leads by 36.2%. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711+36% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+10% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1733 MHz+61% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 176+10% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+6% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+75% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 180W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 400W-33% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 55.9+2% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 61.6% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 91.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $249-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 40.4+91% |
| Codename | GM200 | GP104 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #179 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













