
GeForce GTX 950M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8770
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015Radeon HD 8770
2013Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 8770 better than GeForce GTX 950M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 950M make more sense than Radeon HD 8770?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 23 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950M and Radeon HD 8770

GeForce GTX 950M
GeForce GTX 950M
The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.

Radeon HD 8770
Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950M scores 2,575 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,575 | 2,607+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.439 TFLOPS+127% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+36% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+233% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 950M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 8770 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8770) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 34.3 | 52.1+52% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | GM107 | Mars |
| Release | March 13 2015 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #626 | #844 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












