
GeForce GTX 950M
Popular choices:

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M better than GeForce GTX 950M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 950M make more sense than MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 30 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950M and MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

GeForce GTX 950M
GeForce GTX 950M
The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950M scores 2,575 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950M is built on Maxwell while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,575 | 2,637+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.439 TFLOPS+51% | 0.9523 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 512 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950M draws 75W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 34.3+30% | 26.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












