GeForce GTX 950M vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950M

2015Core: 914 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 950M

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M better than GeForce GTX 950M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 2,575 vs 2,637 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 950M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012 and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 950M is the newer 2015 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 100W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does GeForce GTX 950M make more sense than MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M?
Yes. GeForce GTX 950M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 100W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M. The trade-off is that MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M currently gives you 2.4% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 950MMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
1080p
low23 FPS51 FPS
medium13 FPS41 FPS
high8 FPS25 FPS
ultra4 FPS15 FPS
1440p
low11 FPS28 FPS
medium6 FPS21 FPS
high3 FPS12 FPS
ultra1 FPS7 FPS
4K
low4 FPS11 FPS
medium2 FPS9 FPS
high1 FPS5 FPS
ultra1 FPS5 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 950MMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
1080p
low64 FPS94 FPS
medium36 FPS73 FPS
high26 FPS60 FPS
ultra16 FPS42 FPS
1440p
low29 FPS56 FPS
medium18 FPS40 FPS
high12 FPS31 FPS
ultra9 FPS23 FPS
4K
low10 FPS23 FPS
medium7 FPS16 FPS
high6 FPS13 FPS
ultra4 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 950MMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
1080p
low116 FPS119 FPS
medium93 FPS95 FPS
high77 FPS79 FPS
ultra58 FPS59 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS89 FPS
medium70 FPS71 FPS
high58 FPS59 FPS
ultra43 FPS44 FPS
4K
low58 FPS59 FPS
medium46 FPS47 FPS
high39 FPS40 FPS
ultra29 FPS30 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 950MMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
1080p
low116 FPS119 FPS
medium93 FPS95 FPS
high77 FPS79 FPS
ultra58 FPS59 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS89 FPS
medium70 FPS71 FPS
high58 FPS59 FPS
ultra43 FPS44 FPS
4K
low58 FPS59 FPS
medium46 FPS47 FPS
high37 FPS40 FPS
ultra29 FPS28 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950M and MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950M

The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.

NVIDIA

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950M scores 2,575 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950M is built on Maxwell while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 950MMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score
2,575
2,637+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.439 TFLOPS+51%
0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
64+60%
L1 Cache
320 KB
512 KB+60%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 950MMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950MMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950M draws 75W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950MMONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
34.3+30%
26.4