
GeForce GTX 950M
Popular choices:

GRID M10-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
GRID M10-8Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015GRID M10-8Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID M10-8Q better than GeForce GTX 950M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 950M make more sense than GRID M10-8Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950M and GRID M10-8Q

GeForce GTX 950M
GeForce GTX 950M
The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.

GRID M10-8Q
GRID M10-8Q
The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950M scores 2,575 and the GRID M10-8Q reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950M is built on Maxwell while the GRID M10-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 640 (GRID M10-8Q). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,575 | 2,595 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.439 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1306 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 950M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID M10-8Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950M draws 75W versus the GRID M10-8Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 350W (GRID M10-8Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 34.3+198% | 11.5 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2500 |
| Codename | GM107 | GM107 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #626 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












