
GeForce GTX 950M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6850 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 254W, a 179W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6850 X2
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌238.7% higher power demand at 254W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015Radeon HD 6850 X2
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 254W, a 179W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌238.7% higher power demand at 254W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 950M better than Radeon HD 6850 X2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 6850 X2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950M and Radeon HD 6850 X2

GeForce GTX 950M
GeForce GTX 950M
The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.

Radeon HD 6850 X2
Radeon HD 6850 X2
The Radeon HD 6850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,534 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950M scores 2,575 and the Radeon HD 6850 X2 reaches 2,534 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6850 X2 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,575+2% | 2,534 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 960 ×2+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.439 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS ×2+7% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 48 ×2+20% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 950M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 6850 X2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6850 X2) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6850 X2's 254W — a 108.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950M) vs 600W (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 254W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 34.3+243% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950M | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $350 |
| Codename | GM107 | Barts |
| Release | March 13 2015 | September 19 2011 |
| Ranking | #626 | #630 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












