
GeForce GTX 570
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 570
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌217.3% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌192% higher power demand at 219W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 460
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 230.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 219W, a 144W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 267mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 570
2010Radeon RX 460
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 230.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 219W, a 144W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 267mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌217.3% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌192% higher power demand at 219W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 460 better than GeForce GTX 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 570 make more sense than Radeon RX 460?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 570 and Radeon RX 460

GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 570
The GeForce GTX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,930 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460
The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 570 scores 3,930 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,930 | 4,099+4% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 896+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 2.15 TFLOPS+53% |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+7% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+329% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 570 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 460 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 570 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 460 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 152 GB/s (GeForce GTX 570) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 460) — a 35.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 570. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2.5 GB | 4 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 152 GB/s+36% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (FL 12_0)+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce GTX 570) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 570 draws 219W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 98% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 75W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | 170mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.9 | 54.7+206% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 570 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 460 launched at $110. The Radeon RX 460 costs 68.5% less ($239 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 offers 230.1% better value. The Radeon RX 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $110-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | 37.3+230% |
| Codename | GF110 | Baffin |
| Release | December 7 2010 | August 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #497 | #485 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












