
GeForce GTX 570
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 570
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌192% higher power demand at 219W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 219W, a 144W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 570
2010GeForce GTX 965M SLI
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 219W, a 144W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌192% higher power demand at 219W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 965M SLI better than GeForce GTX 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 570 make more sense than GeForce GTX 965M SLI?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 570 and GeForce GTX 965M SLI

GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 570
The GeForce GTX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,930 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 570 scores 3,930 and the GeForce GTX 965M SLI reaches 4,010 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 965M SLI uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,930 | 4,010+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 2048+327% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 570 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 965M SLI has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 570 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 152 GB/s (GeForce GTX 570) vs 80.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) — a 89.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX 570. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2.5 GB+25% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 152 GB/s+90% | 80.2 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit x2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 570 draws 219W versus the GeForce GTX 965M SLI's 75W — a 98% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 75W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.9 | 53.5+199% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | GF110 | — |
| Release | December 7 2010 | January 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #497 | #370 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












