G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 570

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌192% higher power demand at 219W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

2018

Why buy it

✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 570 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 219W, a 144W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 570

2010

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 570 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 219W, a 144W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌192% higher power demand at 219W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 570 better than GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,930 vs 3,925 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 570 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2010, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 3 GB, and a 14nm process instead of 40nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 570 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $349 MSRP. GeForce GTX 570 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 570 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $349 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the newer 2018 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 219W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design make more sense than GeForce GTX 570?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 219W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 570. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 570 currently gives you 0.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 570 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 570	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	80 FPS	105 FPS
medium	65 FPS	89 FPS
high	51 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	67 FPS	91 FPS
medium	55 FPS	78 FPS
high	39 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	27 FPS
medium	22 FPS	26 FPS
high	14 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 570 Open GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 570	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	88 FPS	109 FPS
medium	64 FPS	82 FPS
high	52 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	41 FPS
1440p
low	53 FPS	58 FPS
medium	36 FPS	44 FPS
high	25 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	21 FPS
medium	16 FPS	16 FPS
high	12 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	8 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 570 Open GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 570	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	177 FPS	177 FPS
medium	141 FPS	141 FPS
high	118 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	133 FPS	132 FPS
medium	106 FPS	106 FPS
high	88 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	88 FPS
medium	71 FPS	71 FPS
high	59 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	44 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 570 Open GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 570	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	157 FPS	148 FPS
medium	116 FPS	118 FPS
high	100 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	84 FPS
1440p
low	118 FPS	107 FPS
medium	89 FPS	87 FPS
high	76 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	60 FPS
medium	50 FPS	48 FPS
high	39 FPS	37 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 570 Open GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 570 and GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 570

The GeForce GTX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,930 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 570 scores 3,930 and the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design reaches 3,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce GTX 570	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	3,930	3,925
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	480	768+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS	2.177 TFLOPS+55%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	60+25%	48
L1 Cache	960 KB+233%	288 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 570	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 570 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 152 GB/s (GeForce GTX 570) vs 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) — a 90% advantage for the GeForce GTX 570. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 570	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	2.5 GB	4 GB+60%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	152 GB/s+90%	80 GB/s
Bus Width	320-bit+150%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 570	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	11_0	12 (12_1)+9%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce GTX 570) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC (3rd Gen).

Feature	GeForce GTX 570	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	PureVideo HD	NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder	PureVideo HD	NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 570 draws 219W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 98% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.