
GeForce GTX 570
Popular choices:

Quadro M2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 570
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌192% higher power demand at 219W vs 75W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Quadro M2000
2016Why buy it
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 219W, a 144W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 570
2010Quadro M2000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 219W, a 144W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌192% higher power demand at 219W vs 75W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro M2000 better than GeForce GTX 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 570 make more sense than Quadro M2000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 570 and Quadro M2000

GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 570
The GeForce GTX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,930 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 570 scores 3,930 and the Quadro M2000 reaches 4,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro M2000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 768 (Quadro M2000). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570) vs 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,930 | 4,026+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 768+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 1.786 TFLOPS+27% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60+25% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+233% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 570 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M2000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 570 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000 has 4 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 320-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2.5 GB | 4 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+400% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 570) vs 12_1 (Quadro M2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12_1+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce GTX 570) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 570 draws 219W versus the Quadro M2000's 75W — a 98% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570) vs 350W (Quadro M2000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 75W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Perf/Watt | 17.9 | 53.7+200% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 570 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro M2000 launched at $0. The Quadro M2000 costs 100+% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce GTX 570) vs Infinity (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 offers Infinity% better value. The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF110 | GM206 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | April 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #497 | #491 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












