
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,747 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+10.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+10.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,747 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
Trade-offs
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 159 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 119 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 10.7%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,747 | 14,114+11% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1920+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.437 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+5% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 120+25% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.9 MB+27% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 336 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-25% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 106.2+20% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti costs 20.1% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 13.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279-20% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.7+13% | 40.4 |
| Codename | TU116 | TU106 |
| Release | February 22 2019 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #204 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












