
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅129.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌213.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.4 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅129.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌213.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.4 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 117.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,186 | 22,172+118% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 5888+360% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.416 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+360% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 184+130% |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 5.8 MB+346% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 133.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 75% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-55% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.9+1% | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER costs 68.1% less ($340 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 44.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-68% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.1+44% | 44.4 |
| Codename | TU116 | GA104 |
| Release | November 22 2019 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #258 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











