
EPYC 9655P
Popular choices:

EPYC 9845
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9655P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 320 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,753 less on MSRP ($10,811 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 9845
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655P across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (152,985 vs 160,490).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (320 MB vs 384 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
EPYC 9655P
2024EPYC 9845
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 320 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,753 less on MSRP ($10,811 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655P across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (152,985 vs 160,490).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (320 MB vs 384 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9655P better than EPYC 9845?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 96 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 743 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 589 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 390 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1047 FPS | 958 FPS |
| medium | 939 FPS | 869 FPS |
| high | 821 FPS | 746 FPS |
| ultra | 744 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 839 FPS | 739 FPS |
| medium | 733 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 641 FPS | 552 FPS |
| ultra | 562 FPS | 473 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655P and EPYC 9845

EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P
The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.

EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845
The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9655P packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the EPYC 9845 offers 160 cores / 320 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 — a 19.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655P (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9655P scores 160,490 against the EPYC 9845's 152,985 — a 4.8% lead for the EPYC 9655P. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655P vs 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192 | 160 / 320+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+22% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+24% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+20% | 320 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 160,490+5% | 152,985 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 24,287 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655P) and SP5 (EPYC 9845).
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Data Center / AI Training |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9655P launched at $10811 MSRP, while the EPYC 9845 debuted at $13564. On MSRP ($10811 vs $13564), the EPYC 9655P is $2753 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 11.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9845 — making the EPYC 9655P the 27.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | EPYC 9845 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10811-20% | $13564 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8+31% | 11.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












