PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4584PX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,258 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Delivers 219.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 225W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 7642

2019

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 60,169).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
❌87.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.

EPYC 4584PX

2024

EPYC 7642

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,258 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Delivers 219.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 225W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 60,169).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
❌87.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4584PX better than EPYC 7642?

Yes. EPYC 4584PX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 34.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4584PX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 34.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4584PX is the better fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4584PX is the smarter buy today. EPYC 4584PX is $3,258 cheaper on MSRP at $1,517 MSRP versus $4,775 MSRP, and it gives you a 34.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 219.2% better value on MSRP (39.7 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4584PX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of TR4, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 48/96, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 4584PX Benchmark Check

EPYC 7642 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	EPYC 7642
1080p
low	290 FPS	192 FPS
medium	264 FPS	172 FPS
high	219 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	274 FPS	157 FPS
medium	227 FPS	132 FPS
high	176 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	189 FPS	72 FPS
medium	155 FPS	65 FPS
high	119 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open EPYC 7642

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	EPYC 7642
1080p
low	701 FPS	427 FPS
medium	599 FPS	381 FPS
high	444 FPS	312 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	249 FPS
1440p
low	574 FPS	351 FPS
medium	511 FPS	321 FPS
high	394 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	312 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	323 FPS	216 FPS
medium	291 FPS	202 FPS
high	256 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	218 FPS	139 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open EPYC 7642

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	EPYC 7642
1080p
low	1025 FPS	629 FPS
medium	1166 FPS	536 FPS
high	1102 FPS	486 FPS
ultra	875 FPS	415 FPS
1440p
low	972 FPS	524 FPS
medium	879 FPS	446 FPS
high	806 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	338 FPS
4K
low	597 FPS	389 FPS
medium	519 FPS	312 FPS
high	466 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	224 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open EPYC 7642

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	EPYC 7642
1080p
low	1303 FPS	909 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	829 FPS
high	993 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	865 FPS	619 FPS
1440p
low	1035 FPS	714 FPS
medium	897 FPS	624 FPS
high	772 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	647 FPS	455 FPS
4K
low	759 FPS	505 FPS
medium	662 FPS	455 FPS
high	577 FPS	401 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	346 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open EPYC 7642

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4584PX and EPYC 7642

EPYC 4584PX

The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.

EPYC 7642

The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7642 offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 7642 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7642 — a 50.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7642 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the EPYC 7642's 59,333 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 4584PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7642.

Feature	EPYC 4584PX	EPYC 7642
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	48 / 96+200%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+68%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+75%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	60,169+1%	59,333

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7642 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7642 — the EPYC 4584PX supports 47.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7642 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (EPYC 7642). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 128 (EPYC 7642) — the EPYC 7642 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and SP3 (EPYC 7642).

Feature	EPYC 4584PX	EPYC 7642
Socket	AM5	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5200+63%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	256	4096+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	128+357%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4584PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7642). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7642 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 7642 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	EPYC 4584PX	EPYC 7642
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4584PX launched at $1517 MSRP, while the EPYC 7642 debuted at $4775. On MSRP ($1517 vs $4775), the EPYC 4584PX is $3258 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7642 — making the EPYC 4584PX the 104.6% better value option.