
EPYC 7601
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6338T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7601
2017Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,059 vs 35,801).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6338T
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 180W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $3,139 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7601
2017Xeon Gold 6338T
2021Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 180W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,059 vs 35,801).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $3,139 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6338T better than EPYC 7601?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Xeon Gold 6338T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Xeon Gold 6338T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Xeon Gold 6338T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 680 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Xeon Gold 6338T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 834 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 759 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 698 FPS |
| ultra | 565 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 701 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 344 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7601 and Xeon Gold 6338T

EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
The EPYC 7601 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 35,059 points. Launch price was $4,200.

Xeon Gold 6338T
Xeon Gold 6338T
The Xeon Gold 6338T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,801 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7601 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6338T offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7601 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7601 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6338T — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6338T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7601 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6338T uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7601 scores 35,059 against the Xeon Gold 6338T's 35,801 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6338T. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7601 vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6338T.
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Xeon Gold 6338T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+78% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 35,059 | 35,801+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7601 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6338T uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7601 versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6338T — the Xeon Gold 6338T supports 18.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6338T supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7601) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6338T) — the EPYC 7601 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7601) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6338T).
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Xeon Gold 6338T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | 3200+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 6144+200% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6338T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7601) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6338T). Direct competitor: EPYC 7601 rivals Xeon Platinum 8180; Xeon Gold 6338T rivals EPYC 7443P.
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Xeon Gold 6338T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













