EPYC 7601 vs Xeon Gold 6238R

AMD

EPYC 7601

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6238R

28 Cores56 Thrd165 WWMax: 4 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7601

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.
  • +66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
  • 166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6238R

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 165W instead of 180W, a 15W reduction.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (34,751 vs 35,059).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $2,612 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6238R better than EPYC 7601?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6238R is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7601 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. EPYC 7601 also has the bigger cache pool with 66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7601 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6238R is the smarter buy today. Xeon Gold 6238R is at an unclear MSRP at $2,612 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7601 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6238R is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7601Xeon Gold 6238R
1080p
low187 FPS196 FPS
medium165 FPS158 FPS
high132 FPS128 FPS
ultra105 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS157 FPS
medium127 FPS123 FPS
high97 FPS96 FPS
ultra78 FPS76 FPS
4K
low71 FPS72 FPS
medium63 FPS60 FPS
high48 FPS47 FPS
ultra39 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7601Xeon Gold 6238R
1080p
low207 FPS233 FPS
medium188 FPS207 FPS
high160 FPS174 FPS
ultra131 FPS145 FPS
1440p
low178 FPS200 FPS
medium163 FPS180 FPS
high141 FPS153 FPS
ultra111 FPS123 FPS
4K
low112 FPS125 FPS
medium103 FPS114 FPS
high92 FPS104 FPS
ultra75 FPS86 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7601Xeon Gold 6238R
1080p
low620 FPS869 FPS
medium518 FPS869 FPS
high466 FPS833 FPS
ultra399 FPS753 FPS
1440p
low517 FPS761 FPS
medium432 FPS676 FPS
high378 FPS635 FPS
ultra325 FPS569 FPS
4K
low383 FPS492 FPS
medium308 FPS406 FPS
high270 FPS357 FPS
ultra220 FPS292 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7601Xeon Gold 6238R
1080p
low834 FPS869 FPS
medium759 FPS816 FPS
high652 FPS703 FPS
ultra565 FPS613 FPS
1440p
low667 FPS716 FPS
medium584 FPS628 FPS
high500 FPS539 FPS
ultra422 FPS466 FPS
4K
low475 FPS521 FPS
medium427 FPS465 FPS
high375 FPS408 FPS
ultra322 FPS351 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7601 and Xeon Gold 6238R

AMD

EPYC 7601

The EPYC 7601 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 35,059 points. Launch price was $4,200.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6238R

The Xeon Gold 6238R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 34,751 points. Launch price was $2,612.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7601 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6238R offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7601 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7601 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6238R — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6238R (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7601 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6238R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7601 scores 35,059 against the Xeon Gold 6238R's 34,751 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7601. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7601 vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6238R.

FeatureEPYC 7601Xeon Gold 6238R
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+14%
28 / 56
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4 GHz+25%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+66%
38.5 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
28 MB+5500%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
35,059
34,751
Geekbench 6 Multi
21,433
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7601 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6238R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7601 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6238R — the EPYC 7601 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7601 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 1 TB 199.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7601) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6238R). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7601) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6238R) — the EPYC 7601 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7601) and C621,C622,C624,C627,C628 (Xeon Gold 6238R).

FeatureEPYC 7601Xeon Gold 6238R
Socket
TR4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2666+66550%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
2048
1 TB+52428700%
RAM Channels
8+33%
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+167%
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6238R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7601) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6238R). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6238R targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7601 rivals Xeon Platinum 8180; Xeon Gold 6238R rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.

FeatureEPYC 7601Xeon Gold 6238R
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server