
EPYC 7601
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7601
2017Why buy it
- ✅+60.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 35,059).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7601, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7601
2017Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+60.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 35,059).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7601, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than EPYC 7601?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 834 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 759 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 565 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 5 5600X

EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
The EPYC 7601 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 35,059 points. Launch price was $4,200.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7601 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7601 has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7601 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7601 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7601 scores 35,059 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 46.4% lead for the EPYC 7601. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7601 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+433% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+44% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+68% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 35,059+60% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7601 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7601 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the EPYC 7601 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7601 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7601) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7601) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the EPYC 7601 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7601) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666+66550% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 128 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7601) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7601 rivals Xeon Platinum 8180.
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












