EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon W-3375

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4584PX

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon W-3375

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 4584PX

16 / 32

60,169

+1.8%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 8945HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon W-3375

38 / 76

59,091

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4584PX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,434 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 232.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 270W, a 150W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (59,091 vs 60,169).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 270W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.

EPYC 4584PX

2024

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,434 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 232.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 270W, a 150W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (59,091 vs 60,169).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 270W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Xeon W-3375?

Yes. EPYC 4584PX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 29.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4584PX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 29.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 57 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4584PX is the better fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 124.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4584PX is the smarter buy today. EPYC 4584PX is $3,434 cheaper on MSRP at $1,517 MSRP versus $4,951 MSRP, and it gives you a 29.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 232.3% better value on MSRP (39.7 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4584PX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 38/76. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 4584PX Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3375 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	290 FPS	191 FPS
medium	264 FPS	154 FPS
high	219 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	274 FPS	157 FPS
medium	227 FPS	123 FPS
high	176 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	189 FPS	72 FPS
medium	155 FPS	60 FPS
high	119 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open Xeon W-3375

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	701 FPS	496 FPS
medium	599 FPS	431 FPS
high	444 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	574 FPS	425 FPS
medium	511 FPS	375 FPS
high	394 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	312 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	323 FPS	264 FPS
medium	291 FPS	237 FPS
high	256 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	218 FPS	174 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open Xeon W-3375

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	1025 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	1166 FPS	937 FPS
high	1102 FPS	880 FPS
ultra	875 FPS	796 FPS
1440p
low	972 FPS	799 FPS
medium	879 FPS	710 FPS
high	806 FPS	667 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	597 FPS
4K
low	597 FPS	514 FPS
medium	519 FPS	424 FPS
high	466 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	305 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open Xeon W-3375

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	1303 FPS	932 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	847 FPS
high	993 FPS	732 FPS
ultra	865 FPS	633 FPS
1440p
low	1035 FPS	732 FPS
medium	897 FPS	644 FPS
high	772 FPS	554 FPS
ultra	647 FPS	480 FPS
4K
low	759 FPS	532 FPS
medium	662 FPS	476 FPS
high	577 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	360 FPS

Open EPYC 4584PX Open Xeon W-3375

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4584PX and Xeon W-3375

EPYC 4584PX

The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon W-3375

The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 35.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 4584PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.

Feature	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon W-3375
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	38 / 76+138%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+43%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+68%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+125%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	60,169+2%	59,091
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,818
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,713

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 — the EPYC 4584PX supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (Xeon W-3375). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).

Feature	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon W-3375
Socket	AM5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5200+129900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	256	4096 GB+1677721500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs true (Xeon W-3375). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon W-3375 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 4584PX	Xeon W-3375
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	true

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4584PX launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3375 debuted at $4951. On MSRP ($1517 vs $4951), the EPYC 4584PX is $3434 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the EPYC 4584PX the 107.5% better value option.