
Core 5 120UL
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2225
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ✅Costs $889 less on MSRP ($277 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 326.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2225 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon W-2225
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,425 vs 10,558).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 5 120UL
2024Xeon W-2225
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ✅Costs $889 less on MSRP ($277 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 326.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2225 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,425 vs 10,558).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120UL better than Xeon W-2225?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon W-2225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon W-2225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 118 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon W-2225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon W-2225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Xeon W-2225

Core 5 120UL
Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-2225
Xeon W-2225
The Xeon W-2225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 10,425 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2225 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 5 120UL has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-2225 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core 5 120UL is built on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Xeon W-2225's 10,425 — a 1.3% lead for the Core 5 120UL. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon W-2225.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Xeon W-2225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+215% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+45% | 8.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | — |
| PassMark | 10,558+1% | 10,425 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2225 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Xeon W-2225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core 5 120UL launched at $277 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2225 debuted at $1166. On MSRP ($277 vs $1166), the Core 5 120UL is $889 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120UL delivers 38.1 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2225 — making the Core 5 120UL the 124% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Xeon W-2225 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $277-76% | $1166 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.1+328% | 8.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












