
Core 5 120UL
Popular choices:

Core i7-9750HF
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $118 less on MSRP ($277 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9750HF
2019Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,393 vs 10,558).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 5 120UL
2024Core i7-9750HF
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $118 less on MSRP ($277 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,393 vs 10,558).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120UL better than Core i7-9750HF?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 197 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 239 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 260 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Core i7-9750HF

Core 5 120UL
Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-9750HF
Core i7-9750HF
The Core i7-9750HF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 10,393 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-9750HF offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 120UL has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9750HF — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 120UL (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-9750HF uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Core i7-9750HF's 10,393 — a 1.6% lead for the Core 5 120UL. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) |
| PassMark | 10,558+2% | 10,393 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 6,915 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,120 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,149 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-9750HF uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120UL) / Yes (Core i7-9750HF).
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Core 5 120UL launched at $277 MSRP, while the Core i7-9750HF debuted at $395. On MSRP ($277 vs $395), the Core 5 120UL is $118 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120UL delivers 38.1 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-9750HF — making the Core 5 120UL the 36.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $277-30% | $395 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.1+45% | 26.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












