
Core 5 120UL
Popular choices:

Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.4% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Core 5 120UL
2024Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.4% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Trade-offs
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core 5 120UL?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 246 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Core i5-13400F

Core 5 120UL
Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, matching the Core i5-13400F's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 81.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12 | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz+92% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 10,558 | 25,029+137% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120UL) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core 5 120UL launched at $277 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. On MSRP ($277 vs $196), the Core i5-13400F is $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120UL delivers 38.1 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 108.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $277 | $196-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.1 | 127.7+235% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












