
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌197% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+238.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 906.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.
CMP 30HX
2021Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+238.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 906.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌197% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than CMP 30HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is CMP 30HX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and Radeon RX 7600

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 30HX scores 4,892 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 238.9%. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 16,581+239% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2048+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+333% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2655 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 128+45% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The CMP 30HX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: No vs VCN 4.0.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | No | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 27.6% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-24% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 100.5+157% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 66.3% less ($530 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 909.8% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $269-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 61.6+910% |
| Codename | TU116 | Navi 33 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #447 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












