
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

Quadro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
CMP 30HX
2021Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro better than CMP 30HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does CMP 30HX make more sense than Quadro?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and Quadro

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro
Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Quadro reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 12 nm vs 220 nm.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 5,000+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Celsius |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 220 nm |
| ROPs | 48+1100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 88+2100% | 4 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: No vs MPEG-2 Acceleration.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | No | MPEG-2 Acceleration |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 50% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 75W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 66.7+71% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the Quadro launched at $1000. The CMP 30HX costs 20.1% less ($201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 5.0 (Quadro) — the CMP 30HX offers 22% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 1999).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-20% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1+22% | 5.0 |
| Codename | TU116 | NV10 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | 1999 |
| Ranking | #447 | #900 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












