CMP 30HX vs Quadro

CMP 30HX

2021Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro

1999Core: 135 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

CMP 30HX

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 22.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Quadro: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.

Quadro

1999

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 25.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro better than CMP 30HX?
Yes. Quadro is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,000 vs 4,892 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro is a 1999 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while CMP 30HX is a 2021 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
CMP 30HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 1999 and a 12nm process instead of 220nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro is about 25.2% more expensive on MSRP at $1,000 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting 2.2% higher G3D Mark. CMP 30HX really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does CMP 30HX make more sense than Quadro?
Yes. CMP 30HX is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $799 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro. The trade-off is that Quadro currently gives you 2.2% higher G3D Mark. CMP 30HX still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCMP 30HXQuadro
1080p
low124 FPS15 FPS
medium110 FPS10 FPS
high93 FPS6 FPS
ultra70 FPS3 FPS
1440p
low109 FPS11 FPS
medium92 FPS6 FPS
high77 FPS3 FPS
ultra57 FPS1 FPS
4K
low49 FPS4 FPS
medium46 FPS3 FPS
high33 FPS1 FPS
ultra29 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCMP 30HXQuadro
1080p
low204 FPS28 FPS
medium172 FPS12 FPS
high141 FPS9 FPS
ultra102 FPS6 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS9 FPS
medium104 FPS4 FPS
high85 FPS3 FPS
ultra63 FPS2 FPS
4K
low61 FPS3 FPS
medium49 FPS1 FPS
high46 FPS1 FPS
ultra38 FPS1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCMP 30HXQuadro
1080p
low220 FPS225 FPS
medium176 FPS180 FPS
high147 FPS150 FPS
ultra110 FPS112 FPS
1440p
low165 FPS169 FPS
medium132 FPS135 FPS
high110 FPS112 FPS
ultra83 FPS84 FPS
4K
low110 FPS95 FPS
medium88 FPS85 FPS
high73 FPS60 FPS
ultra55 FPS41 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCMP 30HXQuadro
1080p
low220 FPS114 FPS
medium176 FPS88 FPS
high147 FPS61 FPS
ultra110 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low165 FPS70 FPS
medium132 FPS50 FPS
high110 FPS38 FPS
ultra83 FPS26 FPS
4K
low110 FPS37 FPS
medium86 FPS26 FPS
high73 FPS19 FPS
ultra55 FPS13 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and Quadro

NVIDIA

CMP 30HX

The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

NVIDIA

Quadro

The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Quadro reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 12 nm vs 220 nm.

FeatureCMP 30HXQuadro
G3D Mark Score
4,892
5,000+2%
Architecture
Turing
Celsius
Process Node
12 nm
220 nm
ROPs
48+1100%
4
TMUs
88+2100%
4

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureCMP 30HXQuadro
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureCMP 30HXQuadro
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.

FeatureCMP 30HXQuadro
Max Displays
0
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: No vs MPEG-2 Acceleration.

FeatureCMP 30HXQuadro
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
No
MPEG-2 Acceleration
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 50% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureCMP 30HXQuadro
TDP
125W
75W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
39.1
66.7+71%
💰

Value Analysis

The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the Quadro launched at $1000. The CMP 30HX costs 20.1% less ($201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 5.0 (Quadro) — the CMP 30HX offers 22% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 1999).

FeatureCMP 30HXQuadro
MSRP
$799-20%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
6.1+22%
5.0
Codename
TU116
NV10
Release
February 25 2021
1999
Ranking
#447
#900