
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌372.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+119.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 938.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
CMP 30HX
2021GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅+119.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 938.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌372.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than CMP 30HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is CMP 30HX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 121 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 30HX scores 4,892 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 119.7%. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1470 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 10,749+120% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2304+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+21% | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+22% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 2.3 MB+64% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 30HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: No vs NVDEC (7th Gen).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 56.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 70W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 229mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 153.6+293% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 78.8% less ($630 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 942.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $169-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 63.6+943% |
| Codename | TU116 | GA107 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #447 | #252 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












