
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 160W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌128.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+188.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 560.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌28% higher power demand at 160W vs 125W.
CMP 30HX
2021GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 160W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+188.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 560.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌128.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌28% higher power demand at 160W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than CMP 30HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does CMP 30HX make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 159 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 119 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and GeForce RTX 2060

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 30HX scores 4,892 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 188.5%. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 14,114+189% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1920+36% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+6% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 88 | 120+36% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 1.9 MB+36% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 30HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: No vs NVDEC (Turing).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 24.6% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-22% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 88.2+126% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 56.3% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 562.3% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $349-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 40.4+562% |
| Codename | TU116 | TU106 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #447 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












