Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

3470

G3D Mark Score

3415

Performance Difference

Radeon Pro W5500M is 1.6% faster than GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon Pro W5500M4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 3,470 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST2048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
9%
low37%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 3,415 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon Pro W5500M performs 1.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon Pro W5500M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon Pro W5500M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:88
Vram:4096 MB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:1000 MHz
Boost Clock:1450 MHz
Shading Units:1408
Transistor Count:6,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:127.6
Manufacturing Process:7 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):85 Watt
Floating Point Performance:4.083 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Navi 14
Architecture:RDNA 1.0 (2019βˆ’2020)
Release Date:February 10 2020
Performance Ranking Position:544
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:24
TMUs:64
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:64 kB
L2 Cache:384 kB
Core Clock:980 MHz
Boost Clock:1033 MHz
Shading Units:768
Max Temperature:97 Β°C
Transistor Count:2,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:66.05
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):134 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.585 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK106
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$169
Release Date:March 26 2013
Performance Ranking Position:551

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro W5500M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST