G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro K2200M

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro K2200M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro K2200M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Quadro K2200M

2014

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro K2200M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro K2200M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro K2200M better than Radeon Pro W5500M?

Yes. Quadro K2200M is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 3,535 vs 3,470 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro K2200M is a 2014 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon Pro W5500M is a 2020 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro W5500M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro K2200M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Quadro K2200M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro K2200M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro W5500M is the newer 2020 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon Pro W5500M make more sense than Quadro K2200M?

Yes. Radeon Pro W5500M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro K2200M. The trade-off is that Quadro K2200M currently gives you 1.9% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K2200M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W5500M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro K2200M	Radeon Pro W5500M
1080p
low	32 FPS	78 FPS
medium	20 FPS	69 FPS
high	13 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	36 FPS
1440p
low	16 FPS	71 FPS
medium	9 FPS	62 FPS
high	4 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	5 FPS	26 FPS
medium	3 FPS	25 FPS
high	2 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	14 FPS

Open Quadro K2200M Open Radeon Pro W5500M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro K2200M	Radeon Pro W5500M
1080p
low	51 FPS	100 FPS
medium	28 FPS	70 FPS
high	20 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	24 FPS	54 FPS
medium	15 FPS	32 FPS
high	10 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	7 FPS	16 FPS
4K
low	8 FPS	19 FPS
medium	6 FPS	12 FPS
high	5 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	7 FPS

Open Quadro K2200M Open Radeon Pro W5500M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro K2200M	Radeon Pro W5500M
1080p
low	159 FPS	156 FPS
medium	127 FPS	125 FPS
high	98 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	117 FPS
medium	95 FPS	94 FPS
high	74 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	59 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	78 FPS
medium	64 FPS	62 FPS
high	47 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	39 FPS

Open Quadro K2200M Open Radeon Pro W5500M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro K2200M	Radeon Pro W5500M
1080p
low	159 FPS	141 FPS
medium	127 FPS	113 FPS
high	106 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	103 FPS
medium	95 FPS	85 FPS
high	80 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	59 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	59 FPS
medium	55 FPS	47 FPS
high	45 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	29 FPS

Open Quadro K2200M Open Radeon Pro W5500M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro W5500M

Quadro K2200M

The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2200M scores 3,535 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200M) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Raw compute: 0.8538 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200M) vs 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M).

Feature	Quadro K2200M	Radeon Pro W5500M
G3D Mark Score	3,535+2%	3,470
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	640	1408+120%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8538 TFLOPS	4.083 TFLOPS+378%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	88+120%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2200M	Radeon Pro W5500M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro K2200M	Radeon Pro W5500M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2200M draws 65W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 26.7% difference. The Quadro K2200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.