
Radeon Pro 560
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500M across 11 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro W5500M
2020Why buy it
- ✅20.1% more average FPS across 11 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 560: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 560 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 560
2017Radeon Pro W5500M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅20.1% more average FPS across 11 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 560: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 560 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500M across 11 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5500M better than Radeon Pro 560?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 560 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon Pro W5500M

Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 560
The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.

Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 560 scores 3,475 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560) vs 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,475 | 3,470 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1408+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS | 4.083 TFLOPS+120% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 88+38% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 560 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500M) — the Radeon Pro W5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 560 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 12.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-12% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 46.3+13% | 40.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Navi 14 |
| Release | April 18 2017 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #543 | #544 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













