Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

AMD

Radeon Pro 560

2017Core: 907 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 560

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500M across 11 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020

Why buy it

  • 20.1% more average FPS across 11 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 560: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 560 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro W5500M better than Radeon Pro 560?
Yes. Radeon Pro W5500M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro W5500M averages 20.1% more FPS across 11 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 3,470 vs 3,475 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro W5500M is a 2020 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon Pro 560 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro W5500M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, and a 7nm process instead of 14nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro W5500M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro W5500M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 20.1% more estimated average FPS across 11 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (3,470 vs 3,475). Radeon Pro 560 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon Pro 560 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro 560 is 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 3,475 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
1080p
low38 FPS78 FPS
medium23 FPS69 FPS
high16 FPS55 FPS
ultra9 FPS36 FPS
1440p
low25 FPS71 FPS
medium15 FPS62 FPS
high8 FPS44 FPS
ultra4 FPS28 FPS
4K
low10 FPS26 FPS
medium7 FPS25 FPS
high4 FPS16 FPS
ultra3 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
1080p
low74 FPS100 FPS
medium46 FPS70 FPS
high32 FPS50 FPS
ultra19 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low36 FPS54 FPS
medium24 FPS32 FPS
high17 FPS22 FPS
ultra12 FPS16 FPS
4K
low10 FPS19 FPS
medium7 FPS12 FPS
high6 FPS9 FPS
ultra4 FPS7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
1080p
low156 FPS156 FPS
medium125 FPS125 FPS
high104 FPS104 FPS
ultra78 FPS78 FPS
1440p
low117 FPS117 FPS
medium94 FPS94 FPS
high78 FPS78 FPS
ultra59 FPS59 FPS
4K
low78 FPS78 FPS
medium63 FPS62 FPS
high52 FPS52 FPS
ultra39 FPS39 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
1080p
low141 FPS141 FPS
medium108 FPS113 FPS
high90 FPS97 FPS
ultra72 FPS78 FPS
1440p
low102 FPS103 FPS
medium81 FPS85 FPS
high68 FPS73 FPS
ultra52 FPS59 FPS
4K
low60 FPS59 FPS
medium45 FPS47 FPS
high35 FPS38 FPS
ultra25 FPS29 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon Pro W5500M

AMD

Radeon Pro 560

The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 560 scores 3,475 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560) vs 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
G3D Mark Score
3,475
3,470
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1024
1408+38%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.858 TFLOPS
4.083 TFLOPS+120%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
64
88+38%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 560 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500M) — the Radeon Pro W5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 560 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 12.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
TDP
75W-12%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
46.3+13%
40.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro W5500M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560Radeon Pro W5500M
MSRP
$500
Codename
Polaris 21
Navi 14
Release
April 18 2017
February 10 2020
Ranking
#543
#544