Quadro M5500 vs Quadro K6000

NVIDIA

Quadro M5500

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

7915

G3D Mark Score

7993

Performance Difference

Quadro K6000 is 1.0% faster than Quadro M5500

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro M55008192 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
40%
low85%
medium67%
high37%
ultra17%
1440pLow
23%
low67%
medium37%
high17%
ultra10%
4KLimited
12%
low37%
medium17%
high10%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

8 GB VRAM Β· 7,915 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Balanced mode: +40-50% FPS. Helps at 1440p/4K.

Quadro K600012288 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
52%
low86%
medium71%
high49%
ultra35%
1440pLow
39%
low71%
medium49%
high35%
ultra28%
4KLow
25%
low49%
medium35%
high28%
ultra11%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

12 GB VRAM Β· 7,993 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Quality mode: +30-40% FPS. Frame Gen available on RTX 40 series.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K6000 performs 1.0% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro M5500 and Quadro K6000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro M5500 and Quadro K6000

NVIDIA

Quadro M5500

The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:128
Vram:8192 MB
L1 Cache:768 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:1140 MHz
Boost Clock:1165 MHz
Shading Units:2048
Transistor Count:5,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:149.1
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):150 Watt
Floating Point Performance:4.772 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM204
Architecture:Maxwell 2.0 (2014βˆ’2019)
Release Date:April 8 2016
Performance Ranking Position:321
NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:240
Vram:12288 MB
L1 Cache:240 kB
L2 Cache:1536 kB
Core Clock:797 MHz
Boost Clock:902 MHz
Shading Units:2880
Transistor Count:7,080 million
Texture Fill Rate:216.5
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):225 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.196 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK110B
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$5,265
Release Date:July 23 2013
Performance Ranking Position:318

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M5500 and Quadro K6000