GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro RTX 3000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

7869

G3D Mark Score

10858

Performance Difference

Quadro RTX 3000 is 38.0% faster than GeForce GTX 1650

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GTX 16504096 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLow

23%

low76%

medium43%

high15%

ultra5%

1440pLow

11%

low43%

medium15%

high5%

ultra5%

4KLimited

low15%

medium5%

high5%

ultra5%

📊 Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM · 7,869 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.

1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Quadro RTX 30006144 MB

016GB32GB

1080pMedium

46%

low84%

medium77%

high44%

ultra22%

1440pLow

26%

low77%

medium44%

high22%

ultra6%

4KLow

13%

low44%

medium22%

high6%

ultra6%

📊 Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM · 10,858 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.

1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.

4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro RTX 3000 performs 38.0% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro RTX 3000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro RTX 3000

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32

TMUs:56

Vram:4096 MB

L1 Cache:896 kB

L2 Cache:1024 kB

Core Clock:1485 MHz

Boost Clock:1665 MHz

Shading Units:896

Transistor Count:4,700 million

Texture Fill Rate:93.24

Manufacturing Process:12 nm

Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt

Floating Point Performance:2.984 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:TU117

Architecture:Turing (2018−2022)

Launch Price:$149

Release Date:April 23 2019

Performance Ranking Position:323

Quadro RTX 3000

The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It includes 72 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.