
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $8,096 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 533.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.9 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (41,000 vs 65,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
- ✅+58.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
2025Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $8,096 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 533.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.9 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+58.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (41,000 vs 65,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9960X better than Xeon Platinum 8570?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 826 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 601 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 378 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 99 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 910 FPS |
| medium | 724 FPS | 838 FPS |
| high | 650 FPS | 791 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 698 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 782 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 330 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 969 FPS |
| medium | 1002 FPS | 875 FPS |
| high | 879 FPS | 754 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 654 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 873 FPS | 792 FPS |
| medium | 769 FPS | 691 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and Xeon Platinum 8570


Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Xeon Platinum 8570
Xeon Platinum 8570
The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8570 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 28% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X scores 92,808 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8570. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 41,000 vs 65,000 (45.3% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 1,960, a 48.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 18,960 (31.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 56 / 112+133% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+32% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+100% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 300 MB (total)+134% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 92,808 | 93,722 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 41,000 | 65,000+59% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200+63% | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000+37% | 18,960 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 198.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8570). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 4 TB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+10% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8570). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555; Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Content Creation / Rendering | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 debuted at $9595. On MSRP ($1499 vs $9595), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is $8096 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X delivers 61.9 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X the 145.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-84% | $9595 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.9+532% | 9.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












