
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
2025Why buy it
- ✅+19.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.9 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (41,000 vs 48,000).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+17.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,669 vs 3,200).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
2025Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+19.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.9 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+17.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (41,000 vs 48,000).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,669 vs 3,200).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9960X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 826 FPS | 807 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 688 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 535 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 601 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 378 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 268 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 891 FPS |
| medium | 724 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 650 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 1002 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| high | 879 FPS | 879 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 873 FPS | 872 FPS |
| medium | 769 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 674 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX


Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,891 points. Launch price was $3,899.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X scores 92,808 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX's 95,891 — a 3.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 41,000 vs 48,000 (15.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 2,669, a 18.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 22,298 (15.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+5% | 4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 92,808 | 95,891+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 41,000 | 48,000+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200+20% | 2,669 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000+17% | 22,298 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the sTR5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 2048 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | Content Creation / Rendering | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX debuted at $3899. On MSRP ($1499 vs $3899), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is $2400 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X delivers 61.9 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X the 86.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-62% | $3899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.9+152% | 24.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












