
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.9 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (3,200 vs 3,349).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (41,000 vs 60,336).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+4.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.3 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
2025Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.9 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+4.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (3,200 vs 3,349).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (41,000 vs 60,336).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.3 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX better than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 826 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 704 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 601 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 390 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 378 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 272 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 724 FPS | 724 FPS |
| high | 650 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 1002 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| high | 879 FPS | 879 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 873 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 769 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX


Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). Both are built on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X scores 92,808 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX's 93,660 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 41,000 vs 60,336 (38.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 3,349, a 4.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 30,722 (16.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 92,808 | 93,660 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 41,000 | 60,336+47% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200 | 3,349+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000 | 30,722+18% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the sTR5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 2048 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | Content Creation / Rendering | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX debuted at $2899. On MSRP ($1499 vs $2899), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is $1400 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X delivers 61.9 pts/$ vs 32.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X the 62.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-48% | $2899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.9+92% | 32.3 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












