Xeon Gold 6342 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Intel

Xeon Gold 6342

24 Cores48 Thrd230 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 6342

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $4,742 less on MSRP ($2,977 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
  • Delivers 161.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($2,977 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
  • Draws 230W instead of 270W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 57 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

  • +58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).
  • 100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 47,076).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
  • 17.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 230W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6342 better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8368Q is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6342 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8368Q also has the bigger cache pool with 58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6342 is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6342 is the smarter buy today. Xeon Gold 6342 is $4,742 cheaper on MSRP at $2,977 MSRP versus $7,719 MSRP, and it gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8368Q is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 161.5% better value on MSRP (15.8 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8368Q is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon Gold 6342Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low187 FPS190 FPS
medium150 FPS154 FPS
high121 FPS126 FPS
ultra94 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low155 FPS157 FPS
medium121 FPS123 FPS
high93 FPS96 FPS
ultra74 FPS76 FPS
4K
low73 FPS72 FPS
medium60 FPS60 FPS
high46 FPS47 FPS
ultra38 FPS39 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon Gold 6342Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low416 FPS496 FPS
medium364 FPS431 FPS
high297 FPS345 FPS
ultra237 FPS286 FPS
1440p
low357 FPS425 FPS
medium317 FPS375 FPS
high265 FPS310 FPS
ultra204 FPS247 FPS
4K
low221 FPS264 FPS
medium200 FPS237 FPS
high169 FPS208 FPS
ultra136 FPS174 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon Gold 6342Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low986 FPS960 FPS
medium859 FPS836 FPS
high812 FPS790 FPS
ultra720 FPS701 FPS
1440p
low787 FPS759 FPS
medium676 FPS652 FPS
high639 FPS616 FPS
ultra567 FPS547 FPS
4K
low504 FPS487 FPS
medium397 FPS383 FPS
high353 FPS340 FPS
ultra288 FPS278 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon Gold 6342Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low911 FPS930 FPS
medium828 FPS844 FPS
high714 FPS730 FPS
ultra615 FPS631 FPS
1440p
low712 FPS728 FPS
medium625 FPS641 FPS
high537 FPS551 FPS
ultra460 FPS473 FPS
4K
low514 FPS525 FPS
medium459 FPS470 FPS
high403 FPS413 FPS
ultra351 FPS358 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6342 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Intel

Xeon Gold 6342

The Xeon Gold 6342 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 230 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 47,076 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6342 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6342 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6342 scores 47,076 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6342. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6342 vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

FeatureXeon Gold 6342Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
38 / 76+58%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+8%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
57 MB (total)+58%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
10 nm
Architecture
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
47,076
46,681
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA4189 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6342 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Gold 6342) vs 128 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Gold 6342) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).

FeatureXeon Gold 6342Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Socket
LGA4189
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
6144+50%
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
64
128+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6342 rivals EPYC 7443; Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

FeatureXeon Gold 6342Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon Gold 6342 launched at $2977 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q debuted at $7719. On MSRP ($2977 vs $7719), the Xeon Gold 6342 is $4742 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6342 delivers 15.8 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the Xeon Gold 6342 the 89.3% better value option.

FeatureXeon Gold 6342Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP
$2977-61%
$7719
Performance per Dollar
15.8+163%
6.0
Release Date
2021
2021