
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6342
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,568 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 624.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 230W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,828 vs 47,076).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6342, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6342
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($2,977 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌253.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
2023Xeon Gold 6342
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,568 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 624.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 230W, a 165W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,828 vs 47,076).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6342, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($2,977 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌253.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 better than Xeon Gold 6342?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 136 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 986 FPS |
| medium | 1118 FPS | 859 FPS |
| high | 1041 FPS | 812 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 720 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 940 FPS | 787 FPS |
| medium | 836 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 754 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1171 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 828 FPS |
| high | 981 FPS | 714 FPS |
| ultra | 854 FPS | 615 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1019 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 888 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 762 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 639 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 754 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 658 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 569 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 351 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon Gold 6342


Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 46,828 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6342
Xeon Gold 6342
The Xeon Gold 6342 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 230 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 47,076 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6342 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6342 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6342 — a 42.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6342 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 scores 46,828 against the Xeon Gold 6342's 47,076 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6342. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6342.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+54% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+32% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+78% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 46,828 | 47,076 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 28,905 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,206 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,832 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6342 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6342 — the Xeon Gold 6342 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6342 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6342). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6342) — the Xeon Gold 6342 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6342).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+2184433% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6342). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6342 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 rivals Core i9-13900; Xeon Gold 6342 rivals EPYC 7443.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6342 debuted at $2977. On MSRP ($409 vs $2977), the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is $2568 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 15.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6342 — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 the 151.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-86% | $2977 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+625% | 15.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












