PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Costs $2,590 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 644.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 255W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,905 vs 31,350).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3175X, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3175X

2018

Why buy it

✅+8.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅71.4% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌292.3% higher power demand at 255W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

2023

Xeon W-3175X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Costs $2,590 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 644.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 255W, a 190W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+8.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅71.4% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,905 vs 31,350).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3175X, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌292.3% higher power demand at 255W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 better than Xeon W-3175X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3175X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3175X is the better fit. You are getting 8.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is $2,590 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $2,999 MSRP, and it gives you a 27.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-3175X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 8.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 644.4% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and 66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3175X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945	Xeon W-3175X
1080p
low	269 FPS	195 FPS
medium	244 FPS	157 FPS
high	209 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	260 FPS	160 FPS
medium	212 FPS	125 FPS
high	168 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	180 FPS	73 FPS
medium	147 FPS	60 FPS
high	110 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Open Xeon W-3175X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945	Xeon W-3175X
1080p
low	660 FPS	443 FPS
medium	567 FPS	387 FPS
high	426 FPS	316 FPS
ultra	368 FPS	260 FPS
1440p
low	555 FPS	382 FPS
medium	495 FPS	336 FPS
high	384 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	221 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	238 FPS
medium	283 FPS	211 FPS
high	250 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	214 FPS	154 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Open Xeon W-3175X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945	Xeon W-3175X
1080p
low	1025 FPS	1018 FPS
medium	1118 FPS	908 FPS
high	1041 FPS	877 FPS
ultra	875 FPS	790 FPS
1440p
low	940 FPS	734 FPS
medium	836 FPS	634 FPS
high	754 FPS	602 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	538 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	469 FPS
medium	495 FPS	369 FPS
high	445 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	270 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Open Xeon W-3175X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945	Xeon W-3175X
1080p
low	1171 FPS	938 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	850 FPS
high	981 FPS	735 FPS
ultra	854 FPS	639 FPS
1440p
low	1019 FPS	743 FPS
medium	888 FPS	650 FPS
high	762 FPS	559 FPS
ultra	639 FPS	479 FPS
4K
low	754 FPS	536 FPS
medium	658 FPS	476 FPS
high	569 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	363 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Open Xeon W-3175X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 and Xeon W-3175X

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 46,828 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon W-3175X

The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 scores 46,828 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 28,905 vs 31,350 (8.1% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,206 vs 1,467, a 40.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,832 vs 17,358 (3.1% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945	Xeon W-3175X
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	28 / 56+133%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+42%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+19%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+66%	38.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	46,828+2%	46,125
Cinebench R23 Multi	28,905	31,350+8%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,206+50%	1,467
Geekbench 6 Multi	16,832	17,358+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3175X supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the Xeon W-3175X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945	Xeon W-3175X
Socket	AM5	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	512 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	48+71%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon W-3175X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 rivals Core i9-13900.

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945	Xeon W-3175X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3175X debuted at $2999. On MSRP ($409 vs $2999), the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is $2590 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 the 152.6% better value option.