PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,106 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2194.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8268.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8268 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 24,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8268, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8268

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+78.8% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon Platinum 8268

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,106 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2194.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8268.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+78.8% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8268 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 24,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8268, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8268 better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8268 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8268 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8268 is the better fit. You are getting 51.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 78.8% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8268 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Platinum 8268 is 3115.3% more expensive on MSRP at $6,302 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 2194.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8268 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8268
1080p
low	171 FPS	194 FPS
medium	158 FPS	157 FPS
high	132 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	159 FPS
medium	123 FPS	124 FPS
high	99 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	72 FPS
medium	74 FPS	60 FPS
high	59 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8268

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8268
1080p
low	545 FPS	424 FPS
medium	464 FPS	370 FPS
high	389 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	249 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	366 FPS
medium	403 FPS	322 FPS
high	345 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	212 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	228 FPS
medium	247 FPS	203 FPS
high	231 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	148 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8268

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8268
1080p
low	530 FPS	877 FPS
medium	449 FPS	877 FPS
high	415 FPS	872 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	787 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	731 FPS
medium	422 FPS	632 FPS
high	382 FPS	600 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	537 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	468 FPS
medium	331 FPS	368 FPS
high	296 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	269 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8268

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8268
1080p
low	626 FPS	877 FPS
medium	626 FPS	848 FPS
high	626 FPS	733 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	637 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	736 FPS
medium	626 FPS	646 FPS
high	598 FPS	555 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	476 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	531 FPS
medium	492 FPS	473 FPS
high	439 FPS	416 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	361 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8268

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon Platinum 8268

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon Platinum 8268

The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8268 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 33.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8268. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 24,500 (40.7% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8268). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,394, a 53.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 12,046 (5.4% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8268). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8268
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	24 / 48+140%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+18%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	35.75 MB (total)+79%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark	25,029	35,081+40%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	24,500+51%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+73%	1,394
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	12,046+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8268 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8268). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8268) — the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8268
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	1024 GB+433%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8268 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8268
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	High-end Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 debuted at $6302. On MSRP ($196 vs $6302), the Core i5-13400F is $6106 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8268 — making the Core i5-13400F the 183.3% better value option.