Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7272

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7272.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 25,161).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7272, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while EPYC 7272 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7272

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

EPYC 7272

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7272.

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 25,161).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7272, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while EPYC 7272 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than EPYC 7272?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7272 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7272 is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 19.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7272 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

EPYC 7272 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7272
1080p
low	171 FPS	148 FPS
medium	158 FPS	121 FPS
high	132 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	129 FPS
medium	123 FPS	103 FPS
high	99 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	62 FPS
medium	74 FPS	53 FPS
high	59 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	33 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 7272

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7272
1080p
low	545 FPS	354 FPS
medium	464 FPS	312 FPS
high	389 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	213 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	300 FPS
medium	403 FPS	274 FPS
high	345 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	194 FPS
medium	247 FPS	178 FPS
high	231 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	123 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 7272

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7272
1080p
low	530 FPS	625 FPS
medium	449 FPS	509 FPS
high	415 FPS	453 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	398 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	487 FPS
medium	422 FPS	396 FPS
high	382 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	300 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	363 FPS
medium	331 FPS	282 FPS
high	296 FPS	241 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	193 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 7272

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7272
1080p
low	626 FPS	629 FPS
medium	626 FPS	629 FPS
high	626 FPS	616 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	540 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	624 FPS
medium	626 FPS	548 FPS
high	598 FPS	472 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	403 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	426 FPS
medium	492 FPS	386 FPS
high	439 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	298 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 7272

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and EPYC 7272

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

EPYC 7272

The EPYC 7272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,161 points. Launch price was $625.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7272 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7272 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7272 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7272 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 7272's 25,161 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7272. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7272.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7272
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+44%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	25,029	25,161
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7272 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7272
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (EPYC 7272). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.