Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 8840HS

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 8840HS.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 25,156).
  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8840HS better than Core i5-13400F?
Yes. Ryzen 7 8840HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 15.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8840HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8840HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 8840HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 8840HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 8840HS is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 8840HS
1080p
low171 FPS255 FPS
medium158 FPS235 FPS
high132 FPS198 FPS
ultra112 FPS170 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS227 FPS
medium123 FPS189 FPS
high99 FPS154 FPS
ultra84 FPS136 FPS
4K
low81 FPS157 FPS
medium74 FPS133 FPS
high59 FPS103 FPS
ultra46 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 8840HS
1080p
low545 FPS469 FPS
medium464 FPS388 FPS
high389 FPS336 FPS
ultra356 FPS301 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS410 FPS
medium403 FPS358 FPS
high345 FPS310 FPS
ultra301 FPS265 FPS
4K
low280 FPS270 FPS
medium247 FPS247 FPS
high231 FPS234 FPS
ultra204 FPS202 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 8840HS
1080p
low530 FPS629 FPS
medium449 FPS629 FPS
high415 FPS629 FPS
ultra375 FPS594 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS629 FPS
medium422 FPS622 FPS
high382 FPS525 FPS
ultra343 FPS451 FPS
4K
low393 FPS521 FPS
medium331 FPS458 FPS
high296 FPS406 FPS
ultra246 FPS345 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 8840HS
1080p
low626 FPS629 FPS
medium626 FPS629 FPS
high626 FPS629 FPS
ultra626 FPS629 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS629 FPS
medium626 FPS629 FPS
high598 FPS629 FPS
ultra521 FPS548 FPS
4K
low535 FPS559 FPS
medium492 FPS501 FPS
high439 FPS446 FPS
ultra382 FPS384 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 8840HS

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HS. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 8840HS
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark
25,029
25,156
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 8840HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 8840HS). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 8840HS
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming