
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i9-9920X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $993 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 508.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-9920X
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,974 vs 25,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i9-9920X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $993 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 508.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,974 vs 25,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i9-9920X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 193 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 624 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 435 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 577 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 268 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 624 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 624 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 624 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 620 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 624 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i9-9920X

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i9-9920X
Core i9-9920X
The Core i9-9920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,974 points. Launch price was $1,189.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-9920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-9920X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9920X — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-9920X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i9-9920X's 24,974 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9920X.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+4% | 19.25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 24,974 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-9920X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core i9-9920X). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i9-9920X debuted at $1189. On MSRP ($196 vs $1189), the Core i5-13400F is $993 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the Core i9-9920X — making the Core i5-13400F the 143.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-84% | $1189 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+508% | 21.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













