
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6222V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6222V.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6222V across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 24,254).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6222V, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6222V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6222V.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6222V across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 24,254).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6222V, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6222V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6222V better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon Gold 6222V


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon Gold 6222V
Xeon Gold 6222V
The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6222V offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6222V has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 — a 31.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6222V. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6222V.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 20 / 40+233% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+17% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+100% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+16% | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 20 MB+3900% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 24,254+37% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6222V). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












